[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [bpel4people] Editors SC Process - For Comment
> -----Original Message----- > From: Luc Clement [mailto:luc.clement@activevos.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 13:57 > To: bpel4people@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: [bpel4people] Editors SC Process - For Comment > > The Editors Sub Committee has posted to > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=bpe l4people-editors (and found below) the following for the TC's > consideration: > > > > a. Statement of Purpose > > b. Issues Management (i.e. where to access the issues list) > > c. Collaborative Workspace (i.e. use of SourceForge) > > d. Process relating to the Draft submissions for > approval by the TC > > > > Comments welcomed. I suggest changing the following sentence in the Statement of Purpose: "The TC Editor is a role that is occupied by one or more TC members." to: "The TC Editor is a role that is occupied by the members of the Editors Subcommittee." The current wording implies that any TC member can act as editor whether or not he is a member of the Editors SC. I think that anybody who wants to act as editor should first be required to become a member of the Editors SC. Moreover, I suggest we add the following sentence to the end of the same paragraph: "The Issues Editor is also a member of the Editors Subcommittee." or reword the existing sentence equivalently. Alessandro
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]