RE: suggestions for charter

[Greg Giles <ggiles@cisco.com>]

Good start, I would also recommend we add:

- to ensure that each part of the specification maps explicitly to a
documented requirement

I think it's bettter to be explicit about this, rather than implicit.

My 2 cents
Greg
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Tauber [mailto:jtauber@bowstreet.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 2:55 PM
> To: bt-spec@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: suggestions for charter
>
>
>
> I'd like to suggest the following points for consideration for the
> specification sub-committee charter:
>
> - to decide on document formats
> - to appoint editors
> - to gather material written by other groups (esp model and messaging sub
> committees)
> - to make available draft specifications
> - to record feedback on draft specifications and pass on to other groups
> - to publish final specifications
> - to maintain errata
>
> Comments / suggestions / additions?
>
> James
>