RE: suggestions for charter

[James Tauber <jtauber@bowstreet.com>]

Agreed.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Giles [mailto:ggiles@cisco.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 8:32 PM
> To: bt-spec@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: suggestions for charter
> 
> 
> Good start, I would also recommend we add:
> 
> - to ensure that each part of the specification maps explicitly to a
> documented requirement
> 
> I think it's bettter to be explicit about this, rather than implicit.
> 
> My 2 cents
> Greg
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: James Tauber [mailto:jtauber@bowstreet.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 2:55 PM
> > To: bt-spec@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: suggestions for charter
> >
> >
> >
> > I'd like to suggest the following points for consideration for the
> > specification sub-committee charter:
> >
> > - to decide on document formats
> > - to appoint editors
> > - to gather material written by other groups (esp model and 
> messaging sub
> > committees)
> > - to make available draft specifications
> > - to record feedback on draft specifications and pass on to 
> other groups
> > - to publish final specifications
> > - to maintain errata
> >
> > Comments / suggestions / additions?
> >
> > James
> >
>