RE: [bt-spec] addresses and identification

[Peter Furniss <peter.furniss@choreology.com>]

I have made a new issue "Is entity identity modification to be allowed
within BTP", issue 102.
If the title or the description isn't what you meant, please advise.

Peter, as issue list maintainer.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Little [mailto:mark_little@hp.com]
> Sent: 02 February 2002 15:47
> To: Alastair Green; Peter Furniss
> Cc: BT - spec; Jim Webber
> Subject: Re: [bt-spec] addresses and identification
>
>
> In the interests of trying to make some forward progress on this
> issue, I'd
> like to make the following proposal:
>
> (i) we continue with the URI and address split as proposed
>
> and
>
> (ii) we have a separate issue about whether or not entity identity
> modification is allowed within BTP.
>
> It is the latter point on which our proposal hinges, but we do not believe
> that this should derail a 1.0 version of the specification. We have had a
> week of back-and-forth emails and discussions about one point of view or
> another and I don't really think either side has made any progress in
> convincing the other since Wednesday.
>
> We are happy enough with (i) for now, as long as this separate issue is
> recorded and eventually discussed (if need be, post 1.0 since we can work
> either way). If a subsequent discussion and vote on this issue
> then leads to
> an agreement that identity modification is to be supported, then
> there will
> obviously need to be modifications to the rest of the protocol but that
> should be supportable in an extensible manner anyway.
>
> Mark.
>
> ----------------------------------------------
> Dr. Mark Little, Distinguished Engineer,
> Transactions Architect, HP Arjuna Labs
> Email: mark_little@hp.com
> Phone: +44 191 2606216
> Fax  : +44 191 2606250
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>