terminology

[Sanjay Dalal <sanjay@bea.com>]

Hello,

 

As I was suggesting on conf. call today, we should have glossary of terms that we are going to use while defining specifications. Peter Furniss agreed to define 4 levels. I suggest that we extend that list gradually as we progress. This must also be a list of terms that will be used consistently across subcommittees. I suggest a person involved in subcommittees of specification doc. and protocol model should take care of this.

 

For example, if one looks at various ebXML specifications, one can find number of definitions for the same term, e.g. Conversation. This creates a lot of confusion.

 

thanks,

sanjay