Sanjay Dalal
sent:
As I was suggesting on conf. call today, we
should have glossary of terms that we are going to use while defining
specifications. Peter Furniss agreed to define 4 levels. I suggest that we
extend that list gradually as we progress. This must also be a list
of terms that will be used consistently across subcommittees. I
suggest a person involved in subcommittees of specification doc. and
protocol model should take care of this.
As
you'll see, they're draft definitions with a summary of the discussion -
probably will need reworking (even if everyone agrees without, which I doubt).
(BTW, the format (Word) was just because I wanted better than flat-text and
that's what I drafted it with - if people what something different, let me
know)
You
are right that we need a steadily extending list of terms, and I can be the
custodian unless others are really keen :-)
Peter