Re: [cacao] Outstanding Ballots

[Allan Thomson <athomson@lookingglasscyber.com>]

Hi Pat - I think the working calls have been well attended for the most part. I will note that several of the regular attendees to the working calls, and who have voting rights, didn't actually vote on the ballots. We missed one of the ballots passing by 2 votes.

So we would always welcome more participation on working calls. The lack of votes on the ballot were not because of lack of registered voters that could have voted on the ballots.

Allan

ïOn 4/3/20, 6:10 AM, "MARONEY, PATRICK" <rx118r@att.com> wrote:

    THIS EMAIL ORIGINATES FROM OUTSIDE OF LOOKINGGLASS
    
    Re: "- I believe this was primarily because folks didn't vote as there were no *no* votes. Just lack of yes votes."
    
    Suggestion:
    
    Adoption of a more traditional OASIS TC process with monthly TC meetings that count towards voting rights (vs. having working meetings count towards same) might greatly extend voting rights to interested stakeholders.
    
    The current cadence/process make it impossible to achieve voting rights for some of us.  In my case I have a standing weekly meeting that will always conflict with the current consensus Tuesday CACAO calls
    
    A monthly TC call that determines voting rights (with evening sessions for those that have conflicts/time zone issues) could potentially double the roster of voting eligible members.  I of course understand the difficulties of chairing Day/Evening sessions.  But a change to more traditional TC meetings/voting rights MAY improve participation.
    
    Row Labels      Count of Id
    Chair                   2
    Member          27
    OASIS Staff Contact     2
    Observer                20
    Secretary               3
    Voting Member           20
    Grand Total             74
    
    Give it a try perhaps for a month or so?
    
    Patrick Maroney
    Principal âCybersecurity
    AT&T Chief Security Office
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Allan Thomson <athomson@lookingglasscyber.com>
    Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2020 3:54 PM
    To: cacao@lists.oasis-open.org
    Subject: Re: [cacao] Outstanding Ballots
    
    The ballots have closed.
    
    1) The requirements document has passed and was approved.
    2) The terminology document failed to reach the necessary votes to pass.
    - I believe this was primarily because folks didn't vote as there were no *no* votes. Just lack of yes votes.
    
    We will discuss on the next call what the TC wants to do with respect to the terminology document to re-ballot or other actions.
    
    Allan
    
    On 3/31/20, 8:06 AM, "cacao@lists.oasis-open.org on behalf of Allan Thomson" <cacao@lists.oasis-open.org on behalf of athomson@lookingglasscyber.com> wrote:
    
        THIS EMAIL ORIGINATES FROM OUTSIDE OF LOOKINGGLASS
    
        All - As mentioned on the call here are the 2 ballots currently open.
    
        For voting members please take a moment to review and vote.
    
        Requirements
        https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.oasis-2Dopen.org_apps_org_workgroup_cacao_ballot.php-3Fid-3D3488&d=DwIGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=oHkmGgeIxL4TTQnAS-pn1RnC4MvVUHoxFR7OdYWTKh8&m=hms45xHWxt8_OPf1ScLd7fuRaBKbk3LFsNt-5ql-ABo&s=acp1qESbU1x9cFpbxMLV9kQR0_nP6PluIznCFkZUiu8&e=
    
        Terminology
        https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.oasis-2Dopen.org_apps_org_workgroup_cacao_ballot.php-3Fid-3D3489&d=DwIGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=oHkmGgeIxL4TTQnAS-pn1RnC4MvVUHoxFR7OdYWTKh8&m=hms45xHWxt8_OPf1ScLd7fuRaBKbk3LFsNt-5ql-ABo&s=l_oFnDEjki906aWge-PRxbZs5Q4Q7TzdpYjhP-2P14c&e=
    
        Both ballots are for committee notes.
    
        Regards
    
        Allan