RE: [cam-comment] Sorry for missing the party so far

[martin.me.roberts@bt.com]

More comments,
	Sorry for the drip feed, but I am trying to generate a real
example and thee questions keep coming up?

	When you include a file such as in 4.6.1 and 4.6.2, might it be
worth showing what you include.  For example, is it an xml portion ( see
example 1)  - no XML declartion just straight xml, or is it an Assembly
Structure ( see example 2) or is it a true xml file that the CAM strips
down (example 3)

Example 1: XML Include

<example>
	<contents>
		<content>Fred</content>
		<content>Bert</content>
		<content>Wilf</content>
	</contents>
</example>

Example 2: Assembly Structure


<as:Structure xmlns:as="http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/cam">
<example>
	<contents>
		<content>Fred</content>
		<content>Bert</content>
		<content>Wilf</content>
	</contents>
</example>
</as:Structure>

Example 3: Full xml doc
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<example>
	<contents>
		<content>Fred</content>
		<content>Bert</content>
		<content>Wilf</content>
	</contents>
</example>


I have noticed that the examples in the document declare namespaces with
prefixes that are then no applied to the CAM elements.  

Martin Roberts 
xml designer, 
BTexact Technologies 
e-mail: martin.me.roberts@bt.com 
tel: +44(0) 1473 609785  clickdial
fax: +44(0) 1473 609834
pp 16 Floor 5, Orion Building, Adastral Park, Martlesham, Ipswich IP5
3RE, UK 
	BTexact Technologies is a trademark of British
Telecommunications plc 
	Registered office: 81 Newgate Street London EC1A 7AJ 
	Registered in England no. 1800000 
	This electronic message contains information from British
Telecommunications plc which may be privileged or confidential. The
information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) or entity
named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message
in error, please notify us by telephone or email (to the numbers or
address above) immediately.



-----Original Message-----
From: David RR Webber - XML ebusiness [mailto:Gnosis_@compuserve.com] 
Sent: 12 March 2003 23:00
To: Roberts,MME,Martin,DEJC R; CAM OASIS
Cc: cam-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [cam-comment] Sorry for missing the party so far


Martin,

We do have a few gals as well (yeah I know the industry is wildly too
macho a profession!).

In answer to the question on the BP and assembly - the approach intended
is that you have separate assembly templates for each step of the BP.
That way you can more easily re-use those step centric templates across
BPs.

However - as you suggest - you could package them all together under a
'master' template - and include in the sub-assembly  for the specific
step - based on the value of a context variable.

I would say the preferred approach is separate templates.  As you note -
this then allows the BP script to reference each 
template by UID reference or URL directly.

Is there more than that - or is that sufficient here?

Thanks, DW. ======================================================
Message text written by INTERNET:martin.me.roberts@bt.com
> 
Gents, 
        I seem to have missed the subsrciption to the CAM membership and
I apologise as it was an oversight on my part.  I am intending to revise
my example of the assembly I provided before to conform to the new doc.

        However, I have a question. 

        Are you intending there to be one Assembly for a whole set of
documents that are used in a Business Process? 

        If so I think it would be good to have a formal way of linking
these in the BPSS or any other document.  For example you have used
as:choiceID against a Structure, I wonder if for that level we need to
have StractureName which could be formally mentioned in the referncing
document?

Martin Roberts
xml designer,
BTexact Technologies
e-mail: martin.me.roberts@bt.com
tel: +44(0) 1473 609785
<http://clickdial.bt.co.uk/clickdial?001609785.cld> clickdial
fax: +44(0) 1473 609834 
<