[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cgmo-webcgm] Editing question -- WebCGM spec order
Hi Lofton, 'yes', but the when I live that up to you. If it's not a lot of work, I would say now; if it is a lot of work we can do it later. -- Benoit mailto:benoit@itedo.com Tuesday, March 8, 2005, 1:10:04 PM, Lofton wrote: LH> Hi, LH> We talked briefly at Munich about Chapter order. Right now, after Chapter LH> 3 (normative, "Intelligent Content") the document order is: LH> Chapter 4 -- PPF (75-page table) LH> Chapter 5 -- XCF normative definition LH> Chapter 6 -- DOM normative definition LH> [appendixes] LH> As Benoit pointed out, the document flow is whacked by the massive PPF LH> table in the middle, so the idea was something like LH> Chapter 4 -- XCF normative definition LH> Chapter 5 -- DOM normative definition LH> Chapter 6 -- PPF (75-page table) LH> [appendixes] LH> Question: does everyone agree we should to do this (or something LH> equivalent, like PPF in a normative appendix)? LH> If "yes", then: LH> ** now, for first CD? LH> ** later (e.g., 2nd CD)? LH> Opinions welcome. We can firm up the decision(s) at Wed telecon. LH> -Lofton.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]