[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re[2]: [cgmo-webcgm] can stroke-weight be NVDC?
Actually, I thought it was no and no. I'm not sure it was an editorial mistake. We _need_ a Resolution document. Which script writer would have the information to know what absolute NVDC value makes sense? If we allow NVDC values, do they require the 'mm' after the numbers? Ex; NVDC: 100mm, relative: 100%? Either way, I don't care very much, but we have to find a way to stop asking ourselves those questions. We need someone to maintain a Resolution document. -- Benoit mailto:benoit@itedo.com Monday, May 23, 2005, 5:33:48 PM, Dieter wrote: DW> yes and yes. >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com] >> Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 11:21 PM >> To: cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org >> Subject: [cgmo-webcgm] can stroke-weight be NVDC? >> >> >> Fixing some more inconsistencies around style properties, this one is >> probably a simple editorial mistake. Any objections to these fixes? >> >> Stoke-weight >> ----- >> In previous thread about property inheritance, we were talking about NVDC >> or % for stroke-weight. The table in 5.7.5 only allows %. The >> text after >> the table says "an absolute or a relative scale". >> >> Question: Is absolute (NVDC) allowed? >> Recommendation: Yes. (Fix the table.) >> >> Character-height >> ----- >> The table in 5.7.5 only allows % for character-height. The wording after >> the table (unlike stroke-weight) implies only relative. >> >> Question: Is absolute (NVDC) allowed? >> Recommendation: Yes. (Fix the table.) >> >> -Lofton.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]