[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [cgmo-webcgm] s/setStyleAttr/setStyleProp/ ?
For what it is worth, I also agree Stuart stuart.a.galt@boeing.com -----Original Message----- From: Benoit Bezaire [mailto:benoit@itedo.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 5:37 AM To: cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re[2]: [cgmo-webcgm] s/setStyleAttr/setStyleProp/ ? I'm inline with Dieter... -- Benoit mailto:benoit@itedo.com Monday, May 23, 2005, 4:00:53 PM, Dieter wrote: DW> Hi Lofton, >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com] >> Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 9:27 PM >> To: cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org >> Subject: [cgmo-webcgm] s/setStyleAttr/setStyleProp/ ? >> >> >> WebCGM TC, >> >> In the thread about the inheritance of attributes and properties, >> we agreed >> that we would rename "Style Attributes" to "Style Properties", to help >> reduce confusion with APS Attributes. >> >> QUESTION. Are we going to rename the DOM methods accordingly, to >> setStyleProp and clearStyleProp? (Or the longer setStyleProperty and >> clearStyleProperty?) >> >> RECOMMENDATION. Yes. DW> agreed. >> >> Any objections? DW> no. >> >> If we agree 'yes', then Poll: do you prefer setStyleProp or >> setStyleProperty? DW> setStyleProperty >> >> Btw, if we agree, 'yes', then implementations have to change and >> test cases >> have to be changed. >> >> Regards, >> -Lofton. >> >> >> DW> Cheers, DW> Dieter
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]