[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re[2]: [cgmo-webcgm] getWebCGMViewerVersion() poll results
Hi Dieter, You meant users (i.e., it will benefit users) and I agree. -- Benoit mailto:benoit@itedo.com Monday, May 30, 2005, 9:50:09 AM, Dieter wrote: DW> since this is a function for the benefit of implementors, I vote for B. >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Benoit Bezaire [mailto:benoit@itedo.com] >> Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 3:50 PM >> To: cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org >> Subject: [cgmo-webcgm] getWebCGMViewerVersion() poll results >> >> >> Hi, >> >> We have 3 votes for A (Forrest, Don, Benoit) and 3 votes for B >> (Stuart, Dave, Frank). Implementors vs users :-) >> >> Since I believe this to be a very minor issue compared to other >> things we have to resolved; I propose we let the Editor (Lofton) >> break the tie (I suspect every body to be telling themselves "let's >> just agree on something" :). (It's the case for me). >> >> >> Proposal A: >> string getWebCGMViewerVersion() >> returns a string identifying the User Agent being used (ex: Lofton's >> viewer v3.2.2) >> >> Proposal B: >> string getAppName() >> returns the application name (ex: Lofton's viewer). >> >> string getAppVersion() >> returns the application version number (ex: 3.2.2) >> >> Regards, >> >> -- >> Benoit mailto:benoit@itedo.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]