RE: Re[2]: [cgmo-webcgm] getWebCGMViewerVersion() poll results

[Dieter Weidenbruck <dieter@itedo.com>]

You are right, although I thought about implementors doing IETM work,
hence the programmers using the DOM. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benoit Bezaire [mailto:benoit@itedo.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 4:04 PM
> To: cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re[2]: [cgmo-webcgm] getWebCGMViewerVersion() poll results
> 
> 
> Hi Dieter,
> 
> You meant users (i.e., it will benefit users) and I agree.
> 
> -- 
>  Benoit   mailto:benoit@itedo.com
> 
>  
> Monday, May 30, 2005, 9:50:09 AM, Dieter wrote:
> 
> DW> since this is a function for the benefit of implementors, I 
> vote for B.
> 
> 
> 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Benoit Bezaire [mailto:benoit@itedo.com]
> >> Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 3:50 PM
> >> To: cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org
> >> Subject: [cgmo-webcgm] getWebCGMViewerVersion() poll results
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Hi,
> >> 
> >>   We have 3 votes for A (Forrest, Don, Benoit) and 3 votes for B
> >>   (Stuart, Dave, Frank). Implementors vs users :-)
> >> 
> >>   Since I believe this to be a very minor issue compared to other
> >>   things we have to resolved; I propose we let the Editor (Lofton)
> >>   break the tie (I suspect every body to be telling themselves "let's
> >>   just agree on something" :). (It's the case for me).
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Proposal A:
> >> string getWebCGMViewerVersion()
> >>   returns a string identifying the User Agent being used (ex: Lofton's
> >>   viewer v3.2.2)
> >> 
> >> Proposal B:
> >> string getAppName()
> >>   returns the application name (ex: Lofton's viewer).
> >> 
> >> string getAppVersion()
> >>   returns the application version number (ex: 3.2.2)  
> >> 
> >>   Regards,
> >>   
> >> -- 
> >>  Benoit                 mailto:benoit@itedo.com
> 
> 
> 
>