Re: [cgmo-webcgm] ISSUE: zero-valued LINE WIDTH, stroke-weight

["Ulrich Laesche" <ulrich@ematek.de>]

So far I understood line width zero to be of one-pixel width.  This has
caused issues in the past when printing such files.  While one pixel on the
screen is quite visible it might almost disappear on paper, especially when
the color isn't 100% black.  Still, if there is no strong argument against
this approach I would prefer to leave it as it is.

Regards
Ulrich


----- Original Message -----
From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
To: <cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 2:44 PM
Subject: Re: [cgmo-webcgm] ISSUE: zero-valued LINE WIDTH, stroke-weight


> [...fixed attn list below...]
>
> Implementors:  Ulrich, Don
> Users:  Dave, Franck, Andrew, Stuart
>
> Would you please visit the issue definition linked below, and either email
> or be ready (telecon) to give your preferences (or "no preference") on
this
> issue?  So far, we have heard from Dieter, Lofton, Forrest, Robert.
>
> Regards,
> -Lofton.
>
> At 10:35 AM 5/25/2005 -0600, Lofton Henderson wrote:
> >WebCGM TC,
> >
> >Attention implementors especially (Don, Forrest, Kevin, Ulrich, Dieter)
...
> >
> >We agreed at the end of today's telecon that we needed opinions from all
> >implementors on these two sub-issues:  permissibility and meaning of
> >zero-valued LINE WIDTH (CGM attribute) and similar attributes;
> >permissibility and meaning of zero-valued stroke-weight style property
> >(and similar properties).
> >
> >We also want to hear from users with strong use cases, of course.
> >
> >I broke out the two sub-issues and options at the start of this thread
> >(and Dieter already has replied once):
>
>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/cgmo-webcgm/email/archives/200
505/msg00103.html
> >
> >-Lofton.
> >
>
>