cgmo-webcgm message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: ISSUE: should WebCGM 2.0 have more detail about search?
- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- To: cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 06:42:37 -0600
From Dieter's comments:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200506/msg00021.html
ISSUE: should WebCGM 2.0 have more detail about
search?
3.2.1.3
The viewer behaviour described here refers to query/search. WebCGM 2.0
still does not have a syntax for this, neither has the DOM. Access to
individual text elements is impossible.
So how is search being performed?
3.2.1.3 defines a search/match priority, but then says:
"Further details of behavior of viewers with respect to identifying
matches or communicating the identity of matches is not specified in
WebCGM." It was explicitly undefined in 1.0, and is currently
the same in the 2.0 text.
"Search" is not mentioned in the 2.0 Requirements:
http://www.cgmopen.org/technical/WebCGM_20_Requirements.html
RECOMMENDATION: no change -- leave the "how" of search
undefined and implementation dependent, in 2.0 as in 1.0. (Consider
starting a 2.1 Requirements document now.)
Regards,
-Lofton.
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]