[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Implementation Status Matrix
All -- I had an action item to do this. I borrowed basic idea from SVG. Any comments on layout or contents? (It comes as no surprise that Loft-Soft is way out in front of everyone, on his implementation.) Vendors -- We should start to get quantitative now. I will accept vendor input and manually construct the initial version. Thereafter, I think I'll employ some automation (e.g., you will send me a 1-column table or some XML markup, and I'll make an XSLT script to merge into a single table). 1.) tell me what info you want for your line(s) in the Implementation table. 2.) tell me your status on the various test cases. I think, initially, we should go with one viewer/product per vendor -- give results for your best, unless your case is unusual, like two viewers that collectively do it all, and have no overlap (!). One other question: do we (someday) want to explode the table to quantify by sub-tests? Cheers, -Lofton.Title: WebCGM 2.0 Test Suite & Implementation Matrix
This document describes the results of WebCGM 2.0 implementations tested against the WebCGM 2.0 Test Suite. The goal is to demonstrate that every part of the WebCGM 2.0 specification (currently approaching 2nd CD) can be and has been implemented. (For this, each test must be passed by at least one implementation.)
This does not cover all WebCGM 2.0 features. Currently, it only covers the new DOM-related and XCF features.
Each of the DOM/XCF tests consists of a number of sub-tests -- typically about 5 sub-tests per test. The sub-tests (about 100 currently) are not individually reported in this version of the matrix.
The following table lists the implementations that are covered by the test results.
Company | Name** | Product | Version | Platform |
---|---|---|---|---|
Loft-Soft LLC | Loft-Soft | WorldsBestViewer | 0.0 | Windows XP |
Viewer_2 | ||||
Viewer_3 | ||||
Viewer_4 | ||||
Viewer_5 |
** Nickname used for the viewer in the below tables (to distinguish multiple viewers from a Company).
Type | Description |
---|---|
Ok | Implementation passes test |
Fail | Implementation does not pass test |
Partial | Implementation passes part of the test, but not enough to give a full pass. |
Unknown | The implementation has not been tested. |
Test Name | Loft-Soft | Viewer_2 | Viewer_3 | Viewer_4 | Viewer_5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AppAttContent | Ok | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
AppStructure-interactivity | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
AppStructure-layerdesc | Ok | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
AppStructure-layername | Ok | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
AppStructure-linkuri | Ok | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
AppStructure-name | Ok | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
AppStructure-region | Ok | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
AppStructure-screentip | Ok | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
AppStructure-visibility | Ok | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
AppStructure-viewcontext | Ok | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
CGM_Metafile | Fail | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
Node-aps | Ok | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
Node-attr | Ok | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
NodeList | Ok | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
Node-metadata | Partial | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
Node-ns | Ok | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
Node-pic | Ok | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
StyleAttributes-picture | Ok | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
StyleAttributes-APS (pending) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
StyleAttributes-combo (unassigned) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Node-text (pending) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
WebCGMEvent (pending?) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Grnode-Interact (unassigned) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]