Re: [cgmo-webcgm] Implementation Status Matrix

[Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>]

Oops, I forgot to include the CSS style sheet (very little of which is used 
-- I can probably embed it in the HTML <style> element).

Where do we want to keep this?  One idea, while we're getting it started, 
would be in the same FTP directory as the test cases.  When it settles down 
a bit, we can put it in a more public place on the Web site (which we will 
have to do eventually with the test suite also).

Other ideas?

-Lofton.

At 05:03 PM 6/29/2005 -0600, Lofton Henderson wrote:
>All --
>
>I had an action item to do this.  I borrowed basic idea from SVG.  Any 
>comments on layout or contents?  (It comes as no surprise that Loft-Soft 
>is way out in front of everyone, on his implementation.)
>
>Vendors --
>
>We should start to get quantitative now.  I will accept vendor input and 
>manually construct the initial version.  Thereafter, I think I'll employ 
>some automation (e.g., you will send me a 1-column table or some XML 
>markup, and I'll make an XSLT script to merge into a single table).
>
>1.) tell me what info you want for your line(s) in the Implementation table.
>2.) tell me your status on the various test cases.
>
>I think, initially, we should go with one viewer/product per vendor -- 
>give results for your best, unless your case is unusual, like two viewers 
>that collectively do it all, and have no overlap (!).
>
>One other question:  do we (someday) want to explode the table to quantify 
>by sub-tests?
>
>Cheers,
>-Lofton.
>

matrix.zip