RE: [cgmo-webcgm] layername

[Dieter Weidenbrück <dieter@itedo.com>]

Should we consider renaming this attribute to "name" for this reason? 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cruikshank, David W [mailto:david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 7:16 AM
> To: Benoit Bezaire; cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [cgmo-webcgm] layername
> 
>  It seems to me that the layername attribute, for the layer 
> APS, is equivalent to the name attribute to the other 
> structures.  It should be readonly and the test should work 
> like the one for name.
> 
> Thx...Dave
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benoit Bezaire [mailto:benoit@itedo.com]
> Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2005 6:37 AM
> To: cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [cgmo-webcgm] layername
> 
> Hi,
> 
> What happened to layername? Section: 3.2.1.2 Layer says:
> Description. The 'layer' APS declares that the graphical 
> content within this APS and any valid nested APS ('grobject', 
> 'para', and 'grnode', but not 'layer') belong to the layer 
> identified by the contained 'layername'
> APS attribute.
> 
> but it's not in the XCF. I understand that apsid is its 
> equivalent, but there is no mentioning of it in the XCF chapter.
> 
> We have a test in the test suite for it, but the test tries 
> to set a new layername and to remove layername. With the 
> discussion we are having now on exception handling, it seems 
> like that test would throw a few errors (assuming that 
> layername is readonly).
> 
> Thoughts?  
> 
> -- 
>  Benoit                 mailto:benoit@itedo.com
> 
>