[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [cgmo-webcgm] layername
I know. Was just in case somebody ask why. I do not have really an opinion on it.
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Dieter Weidenbrück [mailto:dieter@itedo.com]
Envoyé : mardi 6 septembre 2005 10:11
À : DULUC, Franck; 'Cruikshank, David W'; 'Benoit Bezaire';
cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org
Objet : RE: [cgmo-webcgm] layername
Hi Franck,
yes, I know. On the other hand, we have so many things now that are not
backwards compatible, one more wouldn't really matter.
Regards,
Dieter
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DULUC, Franck [mailto:franck.duluc@airbus.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 10:07 AM
> To: dieter@itedo.com; Cruikshank, David W; Benoit Bezaire;
> cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [cgmo-webcgm] layername
>
>
> Hi
>
> Haven't we said layername for backward compatibility with
> 1.0? (I think it was during Cologne Meeting).
>
> Regards,
>
> Franck
>
>
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Dieter Weidenbrück [mailto:dieter@itedo.com] Envoyé :
> mardi 6 septembre 2005 07:32 À : 'Cruikshank, David W';
> 'Benoit Bezaire'; cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org Objet :
> RE: [cgmo-webcgm] layername
>
>
>
> Should we consider renaming this attribute to "name" for this reason?
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Cruikshank, David W [mailto:david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com]
>
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 7:16 AM
> > To: Benoit Bezaire; cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: RE: [cgmo-webcgm] layername
> >
>
> > It seems to me that the layername attribute, for the layer
>
> > APS, is equivalent to the name attribute to the other
>
> > structures. It should be readonly and the test should work
>
> > like the one for name.
> >
>
> > Thx...Dave
> >
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Benoit Bezaire [mailto:benoit@itedo.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2005 6:37 AM
> > To: cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: [cgmo-webcgm] layername
> >
>
> > Hi,
> >
>
> > What happened to layername? Section: 3.2.1.2 Layer says:
> > Description. The 'layer' APS declares that the graphical
>
> > content within this APS and any valid nested APS ('grobject',
>
> > 'para', and 'grnode', but not 'layer') belong to the layer
>
> > identified by the contained 'layername'
> > APS attribute.
> >
>
> > but it's not in the XCF. I understand that apsid is its
>
> > equivalent, but there is no mentioning of it in the XCF chapter.
> >
>
> > We have a test in the test suite for it, but the test tries
>
> > to set a new layername and to remove layername. With the
>
> > discussion we are having now on exception handling, it seems
>
> > like that test would throw a few errors (assuming that
>
> > layername is readonly).
> >
>
> > Thoughts?
>
> >
>
> > --
>
> > Benoit mailto:benoit@itedo.com
> >
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> This mail has originated outside your organization, either
> from an external partner or the Global Internet.
> Keep this in mind if you answer this message.
>
>
>
> This e-mail is intended only for the above addressee. It may
> contain privileged information. If you are not the addressee
> you must not copy, distribute, disclose or use any of the
> information in it. If you have received it in error please
> delete it and immediately notify the sender.
> Security Notice: all e-mail, sent to or from this address,
> may be accessed by someone other than the recipient, for
> system management and security reasons. This access is
> controlled under Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000,
> Lawful Business Practises.
>
This mail has originated outside your organization,
either from an external partner or the Global Internet.
Keep this in mind if you answer this message.
This mail has originated outside your organization, either from an external partner or the Global Internet. Keep this in mind if you answer this message.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]