[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [cgmo-webcgm] layername
Hi Franck, yes, I know. On the other hand, we have so many things now that are not backwards compatible, one more wouldn't really matter. Regards, Dieter > -----Original Message----- > From: DULUC, Franck [mailto:franck.duluc@airbus.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 10:07 AM > To: dieter@itedo.com; Cruikshank, David W; Benoit Bezaire; > cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [cgmo-webcgm] layername > > > Hi > > Haven't we said layername for backward compatibility with > 1.0? (I think it was during Cologne Meeting). > > Regards, > > Franck > > > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Dieter Weidenbrück [mailto:dieter@itedo.com] Envoyé : > mardi 6 septembre 2005 07:32 À : 'Cruikshank, David W'; > 'Benoit Bezaire'; cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org Objet : > RE: [cgmo-webcgm] layername > > > > Should we consider renaming this attribute to "name" for this reason? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Cruikshank, David W [mailto:david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com] > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 7:16 AM > > To: Benoit Bezaire; cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org > > Subject: RE: [cgmo-webcgm] layername > > > > > It seems to me that the layername attribute, for the layer > > > APS, is equivalent to the name attribute to the other > > > structures. It should be readonly and the test should work > > > like the one for name. > > > > > Thx...Dave > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Benoit Bezaire [mailto:benoit@itedo.com] > > Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2005 6:37 AM > > To: cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org > > Subject: [cgmo-webcgm] layername > > > > > Hi, > > > > > What happened to layername? Section: 3.2.1.2 Layer says: > > Description. The 'layer' APS declares that the graphical > > > content within this APS and any valid nested APS ('grobject', > > > 'para', and 'grnode', but not 'layer') belong to the layer > > > identified by the contained 'layername' > > APS attribute. > > > > > but it's not in the XCF. I understand that apsid is its > > > equivalent, but there is no mentioning of it in the XCF chapter. > > > > > We have a test in the test suite for it, but the test tries > > > to set a new layername and to remove layername. With the > > > discussion we are having now on exception handling, it seems > > > like that test would throw a few errors (assuming that > > > layername is readonly). > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > -- > > > Benoit mailto:benoit@itedo.com > > > > > > > > > > > This mail has originated outside your organization, either > from an external partner or the Global Internet. > Keep this in mind if you answer this message. > > > > This e-mail is intended only for the above addressee. It may > contain privileged information. If you are not the addressee > you must not copy, distribute, disclose or use any of the > information in it. If you have received it in error please > delete it and immediately notify the sender. > Security Notice: all e-mail, sent to or from this address, > may be accessed by someone other than the recipient, for > system management and security reasons. This access is > controlled under Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, > Lawful Business Practises. >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]