[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cgmo-webcgm] FW: Chapter 4 of webcgm
Hi, (attacking my stack of unread emails) I think this is a relatively minor thing. I don't have a problem with either wording (Lofton's or Stuart's), that's my opinion. -- Benoit mailto:benoit@itedo.com Monday, September 19, 2005, 5:50:39 PM, David wrote: CDW> Side discussion between Sturart and I on Chap 4 CDW> Thx...Dave >> ______________________________________________ >> From: Galt, Stuart A >> Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 8:02 AM >> To: Cruikshank, David W >> Subject: RE: Chapter 4 of webcgm >> >> Yes that is probably the case. I just wanted to make it clear that >> XCF functionality did not include any of the DOM query functions. >> >> -- >> Stuart Galt >> SGML Resource Group >> stuart.a.galt@boeing.com >> (206) 544-9925 >> >> >> >> _____________________________________________ >> From: Cruikshank, David W >> Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 5:22 AM >> To: Galt, Stuart A >> Subject: RE: Chapter 4 of webcgm >> >> Stuart, >> >> I guess it depends on how you read it...I agree the XCF is readonly, >> but after the load and apply those attributes are available through >> DOM calls to query and or set in the DOM tree in memory via the >> Javascript interface. I think what it is trying to say is that the >> attributes in the XCF coorespond to attributes in the WebCGM file that >> can be queried or set through the DOM interface?? >> >> Thx...Dave >> >> _____________________________________________ >> From: Galt, Stuart A >> Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 11:47 AM >> To: Cruikshank, David W >> Subject: Chapter 4 of webcgm >> >> Dave, >> >> I have only 1 comment. In 4.3.1 the first paragraph says: >> >> For the standardized XCF content, most of the items expressed on XCF >> elements as XML attributes have a straightforward correlation to a >> standardized WebCGM attribute or property that may be set or inquired >> with a WebCGM DOM call. >> >> I am under the impression that the XCF is a write only kind of thing. >> "Inquire" type of routines don't really make sense to me because I am >> not sure what can be done with the results. I hesitate to request a >> change at this late date, but do we want to clarify that the XCF sets >> things, but doesn't read the results.. Something like: >> >> For the standardized XCF content, most of the items expressed on XCF >> elements as XML attributes have a straightforward correlation to a >> standardized WebCGM attribute or property that may be set with a >> WebCGM DOM call. >> >> That is the only thing I found. Should I send it to the list? >> >> >> -- >> Stuart Galt >> SGML Resource Group >> stuart.a.galt@boeing.com >> (206) 544-9925
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]