Re: [cgmo-webcgm] QUESTION: ban 0x09, 0x0A, 0x0D from 'name' ?

[Benoit Bezaire <benoit@itedo.com>]

Did we get more feedback on this? was it discussed at the telecon?

This is essentially removing any whitespaces from 'name'. They would
become deprecated?

-- 
 Benoit   mailto:benoit@itedo.com

 
Monday, September 19, 2005, 6:30:09 PM, Lofton wrote:

LH> Ref: 
LH> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200509/msg00093.html
LH> Comments:  15
LH> ==========

LH> Probably not very controversial, but it is a technical change, strictly
LH> speaking...

LH> QUESTION:  should WebCGM fragment syntax ban 0x09, 0x0A, 0x0D from the
LH> 'name' production?

LH> DISCUSSION:  3.1.1.3, #3, 2nd bullet says, "shall not contain any leading
LH> or trailing whitespace (#x09 | #x0a | #x0d | #x20)."  Dieter asks, "Does
LH> this mean, 0x09, 0x0A or 0x0D are fine in other places [within objname]?"

LH> RECOMMENDATION:  as Dieter suggests, "They should be banned completely from
LH> a name."

LH> Comments / objections?

LH> Regards,
LH> -Lofton.