OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

cgmo-webcgm message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re[2]: [cgmo-webcgm] QUESTION: ban 0x09, 0x0A, 0x0D from 'name' ?


Rob's email confirms the resolution (or vice versa). They are out.

-- 
 Benoit   mailto:benoit@itedo.com

 
Tuesday, October 4, 2005, 11:36:22 AM, David wrote:

CDW> I'll try to get those minutes out shortly...but:
CDW>  
CDW> Issue, wsp in name:

CDW> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200509/msg00100.html

CDW> Use XML Name attribute content – agree with recommendation

CDW>  

CDW> from my notes

CDW>  

CDW> thx...dave





CDW> From: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com] 
CDW> Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 8:28 AM
CDW> To: Benoit Bezaire; cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org
CDW> Subject: Re: [cgmo-webcgm] QUESTION: ban 0x09, 0x0A, 0x0D from 'name' ?



CDW> Dave, do you have the 9/21 telecon minutes?  Needed for...

CDW> At 10:50 AM 10/4/2005 -0400, Benoit Bezaire wrote:
CDW> Did we get more feedback on this?   was it discussed at the telecon?


CDW> 9/21, it was on the agenda.  From my rough notes, I'm
CDW> thinking that we agreed without any dissent.  Agreed to what? 
CDW> Good question...


CDW> This is essentially removing any   whitespaces from 'name'. 


CDW> No, blank (0x20) is still allowed, so this is still a valid 'name' ApsAttr value:
CDW> "my group of objects"

CDW> They would
CDW> become deprecated?


CDW> That would be the logical thing.  But deprecated means: 
CDW> "prohibited in 2.0 content; legal in 1.0 content, and 2.0 viewers
CDW> that support 1.0 must support it."  

CDW> Another option would be to treat is as an erratum in 1.0. 
CDW> The practical implications of erratum are probably zero.  Has
CDW> anyone ever seen a 1.0 file with a 'name' ApsAttr that contains a
CDW> newline or tab in the middle of the name?  It would be a really
CDW> perverse thing to do!  Anyone who tries it should not have high
CDW> hopes of getting any particular expected result.

CDW> -Lofton.


CDW> Monday, September 19, 2005,   6:30:09 PM, Lofton wrote:

LH>> Ref: 
LH>> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200509/msg00093.html
LH>>   Comments:  15
LH>> ==========

LH>> Probably not very   controversial, but it is a technical change, strictly
LH>>   speaking...

LH>> QUESTION:  should WebCGM fragment syntax ban   0x09, 0x0A, 0x0D from the
LH>> 'name' production?

LH>>   DISCUSSION:  3.1.1.3, #3, 2nd bullet says, "shall not contain any   leading
LH>> or trailing whitespace (#x09 | #x0a | #x0d | #x20)."    Dieter asks, "Does
LH>> this mean, 0x09, 0x0A or 0x0D are fine in other   places [within objname]?"

LH>> RECOMMENDATION:  as Dieter   suggests, "They should be banned completely from
LH>> a   name."

LH>> Comments / objections?

LH>> Regards,
LH>>   -Lofton.




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]