[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [cgmo-webcgm] QUESTION: ban 0x09, 0x0A, 0x0D from 'name' ?
Issue, wsp
in name:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200509/msg00100.html
Use XML Name attribute content – agree with recommendation
Did we get more feedback on this? was it discussed at the telecon?
This is essentially removing any whitespaces from 'name'.
They would
become deprecated?
Monday, September 19, 2005, 6:30:09 PM, Lofton wrote:
LH> Ref:
LH> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200509/msg00093.html
LH> Comments: 15
LH> ==========
LH> Probably not very controversial, but it is a technical change, strictly
LH> speaking...
LH> QUESTION: should WebCGM fragment syntax ban 0x09, 0x0A, 0x0D from the
LH> 'name' production?
LH> DISCUSSION: 3.1.1.3, #3, 2nd bullet says, "shall not contain any leading
LH> or trailing whitespace (#x09 | #x0a | #x0d | #x20)." Dieter asks, "Does
LH> this mean, 0x09, 0x0A or 0x0D are fine in other places [within objname]?"
LH> RECOMMENDATION: as Dieter suggests, "They should be banned completely from
LH> a name."
LH> Comments / objections?
LH> Regards,
LH> -Lofton.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]