Re[2]: [cgmo-webcgm] QUESTION: ban 0x09, 0x0A, 0x0D from 'name' ?

[Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>]

At 12:20 PM 10/4/2005 -0400, Benoit Bezaire wrote:
>Tuesday, October 4, 2005, 11:58:18 AM, Lofton wrote:
>
>[...]
>LH> Here is another thought that has occurred to me during this
>LH> dialog. The 1.0 repertoire would allow, in the value of a 'name'
>LH> ApsAttr, forexample, the character "<".  E.g., a valid value
>LH> wouldbe:
>LH> "my <special> group"
>
>LH> You can see where I'm going I guess:  XCF.  This would
>LH> beproblematic as an XML attribute value, right?  (So can it be
>LH> handled by CDATA section within the XML attribute?  I'm not
>LH> familiar enough to know the answer to that.)
>An XML parser would say that the document is not well formed, you'll
>never be able to get beyond this point.

Right.  So how does one get "<" into an XML attribute value?  With 
entities?  E.g.,
"my &lt;special&gt; group" ?

-Lofton.