[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re[3]: [cgmo-webcgm] QUESTION: ban 0x09, 0x0A, 0x0D from 'name' ?
Forgot to CC the group. Yes, entities. -- Benoit mailto:benoit@itedo.com Tuesday, October 4, 2005, 1:02:50 PM, Lofton wrote: LH> At 12:20 PM 10/4/2005 -0400, Benoit Bezaire wrote: >>Tuesday, October 4, 2005, 11:58:18 AM, Lofton wrote: >> >>[...] >>LH> Here is another thought that has occurred to me during this >>LH> dialog. The 1.0 repertoire would allow, in the value of a 'name' >>LH> ApsAttr, forexample, the character "<". E.g., a valid value >>LH> wouldbe: >>LH> "my <special> group" >> >>LH> You can see where I'm going I guess: XCF. This would >>LH> beproblematic as an XML attribute value, right? (So can it be >>LH> handled by CDATA section within the XML attribute? I'm not >>LH> familiar enough to know the answer to that.) >>An XML parser would say that the document is not well formed, you'll >>never be able to get beyond this point. LH> Right. So how does one get "<" into an XML attribute value? With LH> entities? E.g., LH> "my <special> group" ? LH> -Lofton.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]