[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [cgmo-webcgm] QUESTION: ban 0x09, 0x0A, 0x0D from 'name' ?
I think the parenthetical comment would be helpful. I had never heard the term "format effector" before, and glossed over it when I read the PPF. Rob -----Original Message----- From: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 4:35 PM To: Robert Orosz; cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [cgmo-webcgm] QUESTION: ban 0x09, 0x0A, 0x0D from 'name' ? Thanks for looking it up, Robert. I myself didn't remember that it was in CGM:1999. Should we add the parenthetical "(NUL, CR, LF, BS, HT, VT, and FF)" to the PPF, to avoid future confusion? -Lofton. At 01:14 PM 10/4/2005 -0600, Robert Orosz wrote: >I found the definition of format effector in CGM99 itself. > >The first sentence of the last paragraph in section 6.3.4.5 has it. > >Format effector control characters (NUL, CR, LF, BS, HT, VT, and FF) are >permitted in a (sic) parameters of type String Fixed but their >interpretation is implementation dependent. > >I apologize for not looking there sooner! > >Rob > >-----Original Message----- >From: Robert Orosz [mailto:roboro@AUTO-TROL.com] >Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 11:32 AM >To: 'Lofton Henderson'; cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org >Subject: RE: [cgmo-webcgm] QUESTION: ban 0x09, 0x0A, 0x0D from 'name' ? > > >Hi Lofton, > >That is a nice reference. However, its official status within the IETF is >"UNKNOWN." I certainly would not want to use this as a normative reference. > >I decided the most logical place to start is page 1 of CGM99 under the >heading "3 Normative references." > >Rob > >-----Original Message----- >From: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com] >Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 10:56 AM >To: Robert Orosz; cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org >Subject: RE: [cgmo-webcgm] QUESTION: ban 0x09, 0x0A, 0x0D from 'name' ? > > > >At 10:26 AM 10/4/2005 -0600, Robert Orosz wrote: > >OK, I'll see if I can come up with the answer to the question of what a > >format effector is. > > > >I'm looking at ISO/IEC 2022 right now, and the answer is not jumping out at > >me. > >Here might an alternative place to start... note the "FE" entries in the >table... >http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc20.html > >-Lofton. > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com] > >Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 10:22 AM > >To: Robert Orosz; cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org > >Subject: RE: [cgmo-webcgm] QUESTION: ban 0x09, 0x0A, 0x0D from 'name' ? > > > > > >At 10:11 AM 10/4/2005 -0600, Robert Orosz wrote: > > >OK, that raises the question, what is a format effector? I assumed it >was > > >talking about ANSI style escape sequences. However, I don't see it >defined > > >in sections 9.5.4.6 or 9.5.4.7 of CGM99. > > > > > >What is a format effector? Is it defined somewhere in CGM99 or one of >the > > >normative references therein? > > > >Another good point, Rob. I don't know the answer, right off hand. I have > >a feeling it could be defined somewhere like ISO 2022 (isn't that where C0 > >and C1 control characters are defined? ). > > > >I know from ancient history that we (ISO CGM group) were talking about > >things like HORIZONTAL TAB, NEWLINE, CARRIAGE RETURN, VERTICAL TAB, etc/ > > > >Are you interested to research and come up with the answer? It would be > >good to spell out, just what "format effectors" includes. I just googled > >"format effector", and there are plenty of hits. (I'd like to keep > >processing review comments for tomorrow, rather than get side tracked.) > > > >-Lofton.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]