cgmo-webcgm message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: QUESTION. Transparency (element) and alpha channel.
- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- To: "CGM Open WebCGM TC" <cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 10:05:56 -0600
Attention color wonks....
At 01:01 AM 10/11/2005 -0700, Cruikshank, David W wrote:
T18.4 Transparency I
have a note that indicates there probably should be a note under Other
indicating that this element should be prohibited when the colour model
has an alpha channel?
Why? This element says whether (for example) gaps in dashed lines
show what is behind, or show the Auxiliary Colour. It seems
unrelated to the presence of an alpha
channel.
This was a note I found in the
document Dieter put together on WebCGM 2.0 for the Houston meeting.
Don't know the rational.
Recommendation. Drop it. TRANSPARENCY (element) and alpha
channel are pretty much orthogonal concepts.
Question. However, is there an issue about these following and
alpha channel?
1.) T.18.16 TRANSPARENT CELL COLOUR (v3/v4 element)
2.) T.21.1 ESCAPE 22, Transparent Cell Colour (for v1/v2
metafiles)
3.) T.21.1 ESCAPE 45, Alpha Transparency (modal
attribute).
Some clarification might be in order. To me:
a.) for #1 and #2, this makes sense to me: if TCC is
"transparent", then that rules over any alpha values on
individual colors in cells; if "opaque", then the alpha values
pertain.
b.) for #3 ... it seems to me that they should combine. I.e., if
the alpha channel for a color value (e.g., of LINE COLOUR) was 0.5, and
if Esc45 current value was 0.5, then shouldn't the effective alpha value
be 0.25?
If #b is true, then the same rule actually answers #a -- they combine (by
multiplying), where TCC can only have the values 0.0 and 1.0.
Thoughts?
-Lofton.
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]