[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: for 13-oct telecon agenda
All -- Since Dave is travelling and hasn't sent anything yet, I'll send a topics list. Based on Dave's rough notes from the last telecon, http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200510/msg00043.html it looks like we closed most of the stuff on the previous lists. If it isn't listed in this message, it is considered no longer a topic (closed). In addition to issues & topics below, we need (urgent) attention to: -- examples for Ch.5 DOM interfaces (assigned) http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200510/msg00074.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200510/msg00079.html -- the 3.1.3 rewrite of examples Dave. -- the pictures plus HTML references ('img') for all figures. ??? Dave? Andrew? First, I broke out two topics that are a little subtle / complicated, have substantive implications, could possibly involve an Erratum (1.0). Following those two are the other open (or recently resolved) topics that I could find. ===== URI / IRI topic ===== Starting as an innocent observation about sticking with URI versus migrating to IRI for 2.0, this has grown into a complicated question about what 1.0 actually says, what people have implemented, what rfc3986 (2936) prescribes, etc. Please read the thread, there are some subtle nuances. Implications of URI vs. IRI http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200509/msg00109.html ===== Character Repertoire question ===== This started out as the simple question of banning format effectors within 'name' (which we resolved), and mutated into the question of "to what do the objname constraints of 3.1.1.3 apply?" fragments, name ApsAttrs, both?. QUESTION: ban 0x09, 0x0A, 0x0D from 'name' ? http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200510/msg00008.html [yes, ban them. Erratum?] Character Repertoire question http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200510/msg00051.html [to what do objname constraints in 3.1.1.3 apply?] ===== Other open topics ===== DOM Exceptions -- unfinished item http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200510/msg00094.html [almost resolved] (DC's) QUESTION. Transparency (element) and alpha channel. http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200510/msg00084.html [LH recommends...] rest of DC's review of PPF col.1 & col.2 http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200510/msg00087.html [agreed, resolved] RO's fixes integrated into MP column of PPF http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200510/msg00066.html [closed] ISSUE: relative URIs in 'linkuri' http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200510/msg00058.html [closed, okay as is] RO comment: it's the DATA attribute of OBJECT http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200510/msg00055.html [resolved] RO question: can 'layer' be descendant? http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200510/msg00054.html [LH recommends "leave as is"] RO question: Can viewers detect links from non-CGM content? http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200510/msg00069.html [DW confirms, yes] Rest of RO's ch.3 comments, purely editorial, are found in... http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200510/msg00039.html Stuart asks feedback about onload test http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200510/msg00042.html Regards, -Lofton.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]