more ... Re: [cgmo-webcgm] candidate CS text -- ATTN all!

[Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>]

-- all figures are new (thanks to Andrew);

-- Dave, can you try PDF conversion by Wednesday (2-nov)?

[Note.  I will be travelling and unavailable, thru mid-Monday, starting 
end-of-today.]

-Lofton.

At 11:16 AM 10/27/2005 -0600, Lofton Henderson wrote:
>[1] 
>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/15083/WebCGM20-20051027.zip
>WebCGM20-20051027.zip: Editors draft and candidate CS text, for 1-week 
>review.  See CHANGE LOG!
>
>This has just been posted.  It is the candidate text for Committee 
>Spec.  It is available for 1-week review.
>
>Dave -- please make review assignments ASAP!  All -- please start looking 
>at it.  Send comments before next telecon.
>
>Possible processing scenario:
>
>1.) 1 week TC review for editorial errors
>2.) vote at next TC telecon that we want formal CS ballot
>3.) TC admin runs a 7-day CS ballot for voting TC members.
>
>In other words, in two weeks it is done as CS.
>
>Some notable things about this document (but as usual, look at the CHANGE 
>LOG):
>
>a.) the normative appendixes have been broken out as chapters 7, 8, 9, 
>leaving only informative appendixes (A, B, C now).
>b.) the clarified URI wording is in 3.1.1.4 and 3.2.2.3.  This is the 
>result of 20 emails and a phone call with Chris, and I *think* it reflects 
>agreement between us (but he hasn't yet commented on final wording).  The 
>agreed 1.0 Erratum should match it also.
>c.) it uses OASIS cover page, tho' what is supposed to be in some items is 
>TBD (I have asked Mary);
>d.) it uses OASIS stylesheet, modified by a new WebCGM20.css stylesheet.
>
>You will see a small number of green-shaded or pink-shaded notes, where I 
>want to call your attention to something.
>
>Regards,
>-Lofton.
>
>