Re: [cgmo-webcgm] Visibilty & Interactivity defaults

[Benoit Bezaire <benoit@itedo.com>]

Just a note for now.
We can't based an implementation on a test suite. It needs to be based
on an interpretation of the specification. If the specification does
not provide the answer, we need to fix it.

-- 
Regards,
 Benoit   mailto:benoit@itedo.com

This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be protected
by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail or
any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in
error, please notify us immediately by returning it to the sender and
delete this copy from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. 


Tuesday, May 16, 2006, 2:39:15 PM, you wrote:

> All,

> What are the defaults for the Visibility and Interactivity attributes
> when they are not present in the CGM?

> The AppStructure-interactivity test suggest that all APS have 
> an Interactivity attribute even though there is no APS ATTRIBUTE 
> of type "interactivity" in the CGM as is the case for 
> AppStructure-interactivity.cgm

> The AppStructure-visibility test suggest that APS do NOT have a
> "visibility" attribute when no APS ATTRIBUTE of type "visibility" 
> is present in the CGM.

> Can anyone clarify this for me.

> Regards, 
> Don.