OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

cgmo-webcgm message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re[2]: [cgmo-webcgm] AppStructure-interactivity test


At 10:29 PM 5/23/2006 -0400, Benoit Bezaire wrote:
>Hi Don,
>
>Actually, I think one of the APS should have a specified value (i.e.,
>the interactivity attribute should be set); instead of having both APS
>with no attributes. It would make for a better test (IMO).

I agree ... better test if at least one APS has an ApsAttr set in the metafile.

-Lofton.


>This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be protected
>by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware
>that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail or
>any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in
>error, please notify us immediately by returning it to the sender and
>delete this copy from your system. Thank you for your cooperation.
>
>
>Tuesday, May 23, 2006, 7:14:36 PM, you wrote:
>
> > Stuart,
>
> > I believe the first test, Done onload, should return nulls also
> > because there are no "interactivity" attributes in the CGM.
>
> > The first test should look like this.
>
> >                 var i = gr.getAppStructureAttr("interactivity");
> >                 var i2 = gr2.getAppStructureAttr("interactivity"); // 
> TBD: non-interactive
> >                 if( i == "" && i2 == "" )
> >                 {
> >                   result.firstChild.nodeValue = "Passed!";
>
>
> > Regards,
> > Don.
>
> >   > Hello,
>
> >   > Last telecon I was given the action item to fix the
> >   > AppStructure-interactivity
> >   > test.  Here is a corrected version of the test.  If I understand 
> section
> >   > 5.4.1
> >   > and 5.4.2 correctly the final test (the Start 5 button) should return
> >   > nulls
> >   > because the interactivity is never set.  I would have also expected to
> >   > see a null after calling removeAppStructureAttr("interactivity");
>
> >   > What do others think.
>
> >   > --
> >   > Stuart Galt
> >   > SGML Resource Group
> >   > stuart.a.galt@boeing.com
> >   > (206) 544-3656
>
>
>
>
> >   > -- NextPart --
> >   > Attached File:
> >   >
> > \\barley\apps\goldmine\MailBox\Attach\AppStructure-interactivity.cgm
>
> >   > -- NextPart --
> >   > Attached File:
> >   >
> > \\barley\apps\goldmine\MailBox\Attach\AppStructure-interactivity.htm
>
> >   > -- NextPart --
> >   > Attached File:
> >   >
> > \\barley\apps\goldmine\MailBox\Attach\AppStructure-interactivity.png




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]