Re: [cgmo-webcgm] ISSUE: Re: [cgmo-webcgm] draft text- CGM gzip compression

[Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>]

Another option for location of normative gzip requirement...

At 03:26 PM 3/8/2008 -0700, Lofton Henderson wrote:

>ISSUE:  All of Ch.2 is *informative*.  So this contribution places no 
>*normative* requirements on implementations.  I assume we intend GZIP 
>support to be required, yes?  So where do we add it?  Ch.3?  Ch.7 as a 
>conformance requirement on 2.1 interpreters?

Put it in T.13.1, something as simple as requiring that all interpreters 
also handle GZIP compressed binary-encoded CGMs.

http://docs.oasis-open.org/webcgm/v2.0/OS/WebCGM20-Profile.html#webcgm_4_2

-Lofton.