[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cgmo-webcgm] Re: Status of proposed joint approval process WebCGM 2.1
At 04:38 PM 3/27/2008 -0700, James Bryce Clark wrote: >To WebCGM TC members: > >Eduardo Gutentag (our interim President) asked me also to remind you >that the OASIS TC can send liaisons to the W3C working group at any >time, including immediately, under our Liaison Policy. Understood, thanks for pointing that out. Right now, the W3C WG is somewhat quiescent, as the renewal process for the W3C Graphics Activity and its three WGs is in progress. Also, expecting the 2.1 plan to mirror our 2.0 collaboration scheme, the WG (whose membership highly overlaps the TC) is expecting the TC to take the first step on 2.1 -- hand-off of CS text. >He also asked me to >confirm that he expects the MoU modifications to be minimal, and >completed no later than our next regular Board meeting. Thanks and >regards Absolutely minimal. Wisely, the legal types wrote the MoU in anticipation of future work... In clause 5, the MoU anticipated re-use for WebCGM 2.1 (or any future WebCGM version) and specified the creation and inclusion of a small annex to specify its name and version number, for inclusion under the provisions of the MoU. Per our earlier discussion, this should require no more than 1-2 brief sentences to be added, as the complete contents of the new annex. (If more detail is desired, I'll pull out and forward the text suggestions from our dialog of earlier this year.) Regards, -Lofton. >James Bryce Clark wrote: >> Congratulations on your approval of the first Committee Draft of >> WebCGM v2.1 at today's meeting. We would like to confirm some matters >> regarding the transmission of the work for joint processing by W3C. >> As you know, your team recommended to us that we simply extend the >> original W3C-OASIS MoU (which set out the joint development track for >> WebCGM v2.0) to apply the same arrangements to WebCGM v2.1. I have >> recommended this to our interim President, and do not anticipate a >> problem or long delay. * * * Still, there is one timing matter I'd like >> to confirm. If [this >>new] CD [is] sent for public review immediately, the public review >>starting now would end no sooner that late May and * * * [the] CS >>approved no sooner than early June .. which is when it would be >>officially transmitted to W3C for its work to commence. If that's NOT >>correct, we'd need to hear from you, and (now, up front) we would need to >>alter the MoU * * * > > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that >generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS >at: >https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]