[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: p.s. Re: [cgmo-webcgm] features missing 2-pass criteria
P.S. I see that ACI intensity (setGetIntensity) also has a problem. Don promised this for 1st November. Don? Btw, since this was not listed as "at risk", then it presents a problem if not implemented. It's removal would force another time-consuming Last Call review. -Lofton. At 09:24 AM 11/10/2009 -0700, Lofton Henderson wrote: >I'm looking at the most recent implementation matrix [1] and I have a concern: >[1] ftp://ftp.cgmlarson.com/new21-matrix-master.html > >As expected, these at-risk features will probably get dropped: >1.) ACI Line Type Continuation >2.) ACI Edge Type Continuation >3.) XCF access to transform stuff. > >However, we also are missing 2-pass on these features!!! >4.) ACI Line & Edge Type Definition >5.) ACI Hatch Style Definition > >We also put those "at risk". > >Do we really intend to abandon both of those?! IIRC, they were >top-priority items for Boeing. > >The matrix shows that Ulrich was going to implement at least the >LETD. Ulrich? > >Neither of these is difficult, if you stick to basics as the test does. > >Thoughts? > >-Lofton. > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that >generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: >https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]