p.s. Re: [cgmo-webcgm] features missing 2-pass criteria

[Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>]

P.S.  I see that ACI intensity (setGetIntensity) also has a problem.  Don 
promised this for 1st November.  Don?

Btw, since this was not listed as "at risk", then it presents a problem if 
not implemented.  It's removal would force another time-consuming Last Call 
review.

-Lofton.

At 09:24 AM 11/10/2009 -0700, Lofton Henderson wrote:
>I'm looking at the most recent implementation matrix [1] and I have a concern:
>[1] ftp://ftp.cgmlarson.com/new21-matrix-master.html
>
>As expected, these at-risk features will probably get dropped:
>1.)  ACI Line Type Continuation
>2.)  ACI Edge Type Continuation
>3.)  XCF access to transform stuff.
>
>However, we also are missing 2-pass on these features!!!
>4.) ACI Line & Edge Type Definition
>5.) ACI Hatch Style Definition
>
>We also put those "at risk".
>
>Do we really intend to abandon both of those?!  IIRC, they were 
>top-priority items for Boeing.
>
>The matrix shows that Ulrich was going to implement at least the 
>LETD.  Ulrich?
>
>Neither of these is difficult, if you stick to basics as the test does.
>
>Thoughts?
>
>-Lofton.
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
>https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
>