[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: OASIS TC specs style guide?
Lofton: Good comments. > I see that you have copied Eve Maler, and so you will get (in > detail) what > I will mention. In the SVG WG, we have just started to pick up and use > some DTDs and stylesheets that are gaining ground in W3C for > authoring the > specs. I'm pretty sure I saw Eve's name in the revision history of the > DTDs. I'm not sure what authoring tools are good to use, as I haven't > started using the XML authoring yet. That's been my concern with requiring people to use XML; authoring tools are not yet ubiquitous -- certainly not to the same extent as MSWord. But OASIS is in the business of promoting XML; shouldn't we use our own tools? > Also you might query the W3C publishing people -- they were at the QA > workshop. Susan Lesch, I think was the person (see the attendance roster > for contact info). As you recall from WSQA, as soon as you start > discussing document standards, it quickly becomes a bigger topic than > "what's a handy format?" Yes, I chatted briefly with Susan at that meeting, and our conversation is actually what got me starting to think about this topic. I'm aware that there are other specs/guidelines out there; I just want to hear from you chairs what you think about them. > I would suggest that this topic might deserve a little more > formal standing > than just pulling together a handful of suggestions into a guidelines > document. A discussion list might be good, at > least. Yes, that may be a good idea. I don't think this needs to be a full-fledged OASIS TC, but it may noot hurt to get more folks in on the discussion, so a discussion list may be an answer. I'm afraid, though, that many people will see this sort of discussion as "overhead" and taking them away from technical work. So I thought that I would start small and see where it goes from there. > (I have copied Lynne and Ken on my reply, as they each might have some > comments on my latter assertions. Maybe Lynne, as chair of the > Conformance > TC, might have some TC history or agenda interest about this.) Lynne and Ken got this, as they are TC chairs. Can we use this list to continue the discussion? </karl> ================================================================= Karl F. Best OASIS - Director, Technical Operations 978.667.5115 x206 karl.best@oasis-open.org http://www.oasis-open.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com] > Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 12:08 PM > To: Karl F. Best > Cc: eve.maler@east.sun.com; lynne Rosenthal; > gkholman@cranesoftwrights.com > Subject: Re: OASIS TC specs style guide? > > > At 11:26 AM 7/13/01 -0400, Karl F. Best wrote: > >[...] > >I would like to get your suggestions for various formats, > stylesheets, etc. > >that would be good recommendations for TCs writing > specifications. Are there > >good templates available from other standards organizations? Or how about > >simply guidelines without templates? I suppose that it's easiest > for TCs to > >use MSWord, > > I finally stopped authoring in MS Word a year or two ago. My > last specs -- > for SVG conformance stuff -- were in MS Word, which I exported to > HTML. Huge messy HTML. W3C 'tidy' (plus some manual > intervention) cleaned > these up. I now author in HTML directly, using Dreamweaver and/or > Amaya. Dreamweaver is nice about preserving your input HTML fairly > faithfully on output. Amaya does the same, and is free, but I have found > it not quite as solid as Dreamweaver. There are others. > > But see below... > > >but what about writing in XML using OASIS' own DocBook? > > I see that you have copied Eve Maler, and so you will get (in > detail) what > I will mention. In the SVG WG, we have just started to pick up and use > some DTDs and stylesheets that are gaining ground in W3C for > authoring the > specs. I'm pretty sure I saw Eve's name in the revision history of the > DTDs. I'm not sure what authoring tools are good to use, as I haven't > started using the XML authoring yet. > > Also you might query the W3C publishing people -- they were at the QA > workshop. Susan Lesch, I think was the person (see the attendance roster > for contact info). As you recall from WSQA, as soon as you start > discussing document standards, it quickly becomes a bigger topic than > "what's a handy format?" > > > >Please send your suggestions that I can include in the > Guidelines. To go a > >step further, I wouldn't mind seeing a discussion on this list > that may lead > >to some sort of consensus about which is best to use. > > I would suggest that this topic might deserve a little more > formal standing > than just pulling together a handful of suggestions into a guidelines > document. A discussion list might be good, at > least. Reason: (standard/spec) document format has ramification that go > beyond universal readability and document maintenance. It can be > intimately tied to conformance work, as we're seeing now in the > XSLT/Xpath > TC. Life would have been a lot easier if an XML version of XSL were > normative (instead of only the HTML output document). > > (I have copied Lynne and Ken on my reply, as they each might have some > comments on my latter assertions. Maybe Lynne, as chair of the > Conformance > TC, might have some TC history or agenda interest about this.) > > Regards, > -Lofton. > > > ******************* > Lofton Henderson > 1919 Fourteenth St., #604 > Boulder, CO 80302 > > Phone: 303-449-8728 > Email: lofton@rockynet.com > ******************* > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC