[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [chairs] Re: Quorum required for good standing
Definitely -- 'members' are those with voting rights (except when on a Leave of Absence). -- Steve -----Original Message----- From: Darran Rolls [mailto:Darran.Rolls@waveset.com] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 2:40 PM To: Steve Anderson; Jeff Kenton Cc: Hal Lockhart; chairs@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [chairs] Re: Quorum required for good standing Qualification: entire TC body = members in "good-standing" rght? -------------------------------------------------------- Darran Rolls http://www.waveset.com Waveset Technologies Inc drolls@waveset.com (512) 657 8360 -------------------------------------------------------- > -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Anderson [mailto:sanderson@opennetwork.com] > Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 1:23 PM > To: Jeff Kenton > Cc: Hal Lockhart; chairs@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [chairs] Re: Quorum required for good standing > > This, based on my experience, a desired effect of an email vote -- > ensuring that the vote carries the consent of the (majority of) the entire > TC body. > -- > Steve > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeff Kenton [mailto:jkenton@datapower.com] > Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 2:07 PM > To: Jeff Kenton > Cc: Hal Lockhart; Steve Anderson; chairs@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [chairs] Re: Quorum required for good standing > > > Jeff Kenton wrote: > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Steve Anderson [mailto:sanderson@opennetwork.com] > >>> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 12:30 PM > >>> To: chairs@lists.oasis-open.org > >>> Subject: RE: [chairs] Re: Quorum required for good standing > >>> > > > > ... > > > >>> If we take this path, the replacement text would be: > >>> > >>> "Email votes require majority of TC membership in order to pass." > >>> > > > > Note that a literal reading of this phrase makes deliberate abstentions > > equivalent to "NO" votes. > > > > In theory, this could also mean that you require twice as many "YES" votes > to pass something by email as you would in a meeting with a minimal > quorum. > > This isn't necessarily an objection -- but it's good to know what you're > saying. > > > -- > -------------------------- > Jeff Kenton > DataPower Technology, Inc. > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC