OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

chairs message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [chairs] Gentle reminder to all TCs regarding acknowledging comments during your feedback


I agree - figuring out how to present that broader scope. I'll put it
on my list for next week...

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Robin Cover <robin@oasis-open.org> wrote:
>> Lately I have received some complaints from people who
>> took the time to provide comments during public reviews...
>
> Excellent reminder below about professional etiquette
> in taking time to "thank those who take the time to send
> you comments."
>
> This may be a good time also to remind TCs about the
> professional courtesy in providing a published summary
> of all comments and dispositions at the end of a public
> review period.  The following complaint has also been
> heard, increasingly, from parties who simply want to
> know what happened in a public review event:
>
> "I looked for the disposition log following the public review
> of the specification, and could not find any document/record
> summarizing the disposition of comments."
>
> The public review "disposition log" is not labeled with
> that descriptor in the TC Process, which says in more
> general terms that a final record (viz., "at the end")
> is required:
>
>   "The TC must acknowledge the receipt of each comment,
>    track the comments received, and post to its
>    primary e-mail list its disposition of each comment
>    at the end of the review period."
>
> http://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/tc-process#publicReview-comments
>
> Historically, it's become common practice for TCs
> to present a final (rollup) summary using a spreadsheet
> or similar publication which compiles (logs) the comments
> from the two lists (TC Comment List, TC Discussion
> List), removes duplicates, isolates discrete issues
> from compound/aggregated statements, documents
> the TC's disposition for each comment, and links to
> the list archive sources for each atomic comment.
> TCs sometimes also refer to issues in a JIRA
> project (component), if triage of comments has been
> done using the JIRA issue tracker facility.
>
> Such summary presentation in a published disposition
> log (also called a "Comment Resolution Log") makes it
> easy for any member of the TC, OASIS, or external
> party to examine the key facts about a public review.
>
> I have suggested to the TC Admin team that we
> initiate a practice of including the disposition log
> (summary) or a pointer to it in the OASIS Library
> with each public review document/stage, so that
> it may always be be found in a predictable location,
> even if the summary is "no comments received".
>
> Further discussion about the role of a Disposition
> Log (aka Comment Resolution Log) as a means of
> providing the summary "at the end of the review period"
> is presented in the TC Handbook (under "Feedback"):
>
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/TChandbook/Reference/PublicReviews.html#commentResolutionLog
>
> Cheers,
>
> - Robin
>
> Robin Cover
> OASIS, Director of Information Services
> Editor, Cover Pages and XML Daily Newslink
> Email: robin@oasis-open.org
> Staff bio: http://www.oasis-open.org/people/staff/robin-cover
> Cover Pages: http://xml.coverpages.org/
> Newsletter: http://xml.coverpages.org/newsletterArchive.html
> Tel: +1 972-296-1783
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Chet Ensign <chet.ensign@oasis-open.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> Chairs,
>>
>> Just a short etiquette reminder that I ask you to share with members
>> of your Technical Committees as appropriate.
>>
>> Lately I have received some complaints from people who took the time
>> to provide comments during public reviews only to have their offerings
>> seemingly disappear into the electronic void.
>>
>> The OASIS TC Process places only the most minimal of obligations on
>> TCs regarding the handling of comments however it does say in section
>> 3.2, Public Review of a Committee Draft that "The TC must acknowledge
>> the receipt of each comment..."
>>
>> Please, if you do nothing else, acknowledge and thank those who take
>> the time to send you comments. It may be easiest if one TC member is
>> tasked with the responsibility of processing comments back in to the
>> TC, including acknowledging receipt. But however you do it, if someone
>> makes the effort to provide you with feedback, it is just common
>> courtesy to let them know that their comments have been received.
>>
>> Thanks & best regards,
>>
>> /chet
>> ----------------
>> Chet Ensign
>> Director of Standards Development and TC Administration
>> OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
>> http://www.oasis-open.org
>>
>> Primary: +1 973-378-3472
>> Mobile: +1 201-341-1393
>>
>> Follow OASIS on:
>> LinkedIn:    http://linkd.in/OASISopen
>> Twitter:        http://twitter.com/OASISopen
>> Facebook:  http://facebook.com/oasis.open
>
>
>
>
> --
> Robin Cover
> OASIS, Director of Information Services
> Editor, Cover Pages and XML Daily Newslink
> Email: robin@oasis-open.org
> Staff bio: http://www.oasis-open.org/people/staff/robin-cover
> Cover Pages: http://xml.coverpages.org/
> Newsletter: http://xml.coverpages.org/newsletterArchive.html
> Tel: +1 972-296-1783



-- 

/chet
----------------
Chet Ensign
Director of Standards Development and TC Administration
OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
http://www.oasis-open.org

Primary: +1 973-378-3472
Mobile: +1 201-341-1393

Follow OASIS on:
LinkedIn:    http://linkd.in/OASISopen
Twitter:        http://twitter.com/OASISopen
Facebook:  http://facebook.com/oasis.open


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]