[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: Our semantics.
Ram, It seems to me that the approach John is promoting is counter to what people expect from a 'natural' use of the expressive structure of XML. The current CIQ address definately follows that natural use model. Also - the ebXML approach is designed to move the semantic clutter OUT of the transactional markup and into core component definitions accessible via a registry and cross referenced by UID. This nets huge definate benefits across the board in simplicity, ease of use, maintenance and above all abstracts the business semantics away from any flavour of the month - whether it be RDF, Semantic Web or whatever - AND gets you language independence. An obvious next step for CIQ is to develop ebXML core components. We will be able to do that very shortly once the XBDL work standardizes on a representation model that people can submit using. I expect this to happen over the next month - a white paper will be out next week. Therefore I do not see a need to change our current approach. Thanks, DW. =============================================== Message text written by Ram Kumar > John Thanks for the info. Appreciated. I will go through your doc. and will get back to you on your suggestions. Regards Ram<
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC