FW: [ciq-comment] Public Comment

["Ram Kumar" <rkumar@msi.com.au>]

CIQ TC,

FYI.

Regards,

Ram

-----Original Message-----
From: James Bryce Clark [mailto:jamie.clark@oasis-open.org]
Sent: Wednesday, 10 March 2004 8:45 AM
To: Ram Kumar
Subject: Fwd: [ciq-comment] Public Comment


FYI JBC

>Date: 9 Mar 2004 19:03:30 -0000
>To: ciq-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
>From: comment-form@oasis-open.org
>Subject: [ciq-comment] Public Comment
>
>Comment from: eday@obj-sys.com
>
>We are developing an XML data binding tool and as part of the testing have
>been going through the available schemas at OASIS and attempting to
>compile them.  We encountered a problem with the CIQ schema with the
>FreeTextLine type.  It is defined in two places: xCIL.xsd and
>xCRL.xsd.  While this may technically be OK, it causes problems for the
>binding application because these two schemas import from one another and
>the result is a duplicate definition in a header file.  We think that
>since these schemas import from one another, it would be better if only a
>single definition of this type exists.  Would this fix be possible in a
>future version?
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this list, send a post to
>ciq-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org, or visit
>http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/.