[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ciq] Use of Codelist in CIQ - A thought
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [ciq] Use of Codelist in CIQ - A thought
From: "Ram Kumar" <kumar.sydney@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, April 26, 2007 6:56 pm
To: ciq@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: "Max Voskob" <max.voskob@paradise.net.nz>, "Bruehlmeier, David"
<david.bruehlmeier@sap.com>, "David Bruehlmeier"
<typo3@bruehlmeier.com>, "Colin Wallis" <colin_wallis@hotmail.com>
Members,I sent you a list of questions earlier about the things we need to considerbefore using Codelist in CIQ. I have a thought. How about we use two versionsof CIQ :- On using codelist and the other without codelist, but with the current approachfor codelists.Though we will have two versions of the schemas, the XML documents generatedout of the two schemas will still be the same. Except that, one will do one passvalidation and the other will do two pass validation.This gives the flexibility to the users to decide the best approach for them.Let me know your thoughts. The reason why I thought about this idea is becauseI am of the view that when users embedd CIQ specs., as part of their application orother specs., and if they do not use codelist approach to handle their codes, theywill be forced to jsut validate CIQ related data using codelist methodology whichcould be a pain for them.Regards,Ram
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]