[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ciq] Initial Draft extensible Party Relationships Language (xPRL)v3.0 specification
Hi David, Many thanks on your comments. Will look into them and come back to you. Regards, Ram Bruehlmeier, David wrote: > Hi Ram, > > sorry for not responding earlier. I just got back from vacation. > > IMO, the specification is straight-forward and covers what is needed to > represent relationships between parties. I support the decision to drop > the somewhat "artificial" entity "group", which can very well be > represented by the existing entity "organisation". > > Just a few minor notes: > > 1. I suggest to add the attribute "RelationshipStartReason" in symmetry > to "RelationshipsEndReason". This might be useful e.g. when to companies > merge, the RelationshipStartReason could be "Merger". > > 2. In the examples in the ciq-xprl-specs-v3.doc chapter 5.11.x, I > suggest to use different names for RelationshipType: > 5.11.1 "Wife-Husband" -> "Marriage" > 5.11.2 "Subsidiary-Parent" -> "Corporation" > 5.11.3 "Employer-Employee" -> "Employment" > 5.11.5 "Wife-Husband" -> "Marriage" / "Sister-Brother" -> Siblings > > 3. I also suggest to use these terms in the documentation fields of > xPRL.xsd and in the example xml files. > > 4. I don't understand nor see the necessity of the attribute > "IsLegalEntity" in xPRL.xsd > > 5. In an earlier draft, I once saw the entity "review" (or similar) > which was related to the relationship. Although it's certainly not > crucial, I kind of liked the idea of having a formal way to document the > reviewing of relationships. Your thoughts on that? > > Regards, > Dave > > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ram Kumar [mailto:ram.kumar@oasis-open.org] >> Sent: Dienstag, 24. Juli 2007 11:42 >> To: ciq@lists.oasis-open.org >> Cc: liz.kolster@ssc.govt.nz >> Subject: [ciq] Initial Draft extensible Party Relationships >> Language (xPRL) v3.0 specification >> >> Team, >> >> Please find enclosed the first draft of xPRL v3.0 specifications for >> your review. >> This package contains: >> >> - a draft specifications document >> - xPRL draft schema (uses v3.0 Public Review 02 specs namel, >> xNL, xAL, >> and xPIL) >> - 12 examples demonstrating the application of xPRL >> >> Please review the specs., and let me know your views. Please >> note that >> since we introduced >> Relationships Language in 2001, the following were/are >> considered out of >> scope for xPRL: >> >> * Transactional "customer/party information" such as recent >> purchases, payment history, etc. >> >> * Message envelopes that carry CIQ relationship payload >> >> * Formatting of the CIQ represented relationship data >> >> * Privacy and security issues connected to exchanging and >> storing personal information and relationships >> >> * Data exchange methods and procedures for party relationship >> information >> >> * Messaging protocol for exchange of party relationship >> information >> >> * Validation/verification of party relationship information >> >> * API specifications >> >> * Relationships between Party and any other entity such as >> financial/business transaction, product, service, etc >> >> * Privacy and access policies, access logging, tracking, and >> control of party data and between parties >> >> Please provide input in the form of criticisms, suggestions, >> feedback, >> etc that will help us move forward. >> >> Regards, >> >> Ram >> >> -- >> >> Ram Kumar >> Manager - Technical Committee Development >> OASIS >> Post Office Box 455 >> Billerica,MA 0821 >> USA >> +61 412 758 025 (Direct) >> + 1 978 667 5115 (OASIS HQ) >> + 1 978 667 5114 (Fax) >> ram.kumar@oasis-open.org >> http://www.oasis-open.org >> "Advancing e-Business Standards Since 1993" >> >> >> > > -- Ram Kumar Manager - Technical Committee Development OASIS Post Office Box 455 Billerica,MA 0821 USA +61 412 758 025 (Direct) + 1 978 667 5115 (OASIS HQ) + 1 978 667 5114 (Fax) ram.kumar@oasis-open.org http://www.oasis-open.org "Advancing e-Business Standards Since 1993"
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]