Re: [ciq] FW: [members] Public Review of eNotarization Markup Language (ENML) Version 1.0

[Ram Kumar <kumar.sydney@gmail.com>]

Colin et al,

 

This has always been the case. When standard committees are not interested in reuse, how do we expect public to follow standards? We as TCs should set an example  to interoperate oru specs. within our TCs. We as a TC constantly look for feedback from other groups so that we can improve our specs. to ensure we cater common requirements. But they just go ahead and make their own decisions and they do not even tell why they decided to do their own version.

 

I have been raising this issue for many years now, but it has been of no use.

 

Regards,

 

Ram

 

On 3/25/09, David RR Webber (XML) <david@drrw.info> wrote:

Colin,

 

Sigh. 

 

Yes - it seem like at one point we were holding the sand in the bucket - now folks are "borrowing" liberally from CIQ what they feel they need - not attributing - and creating something that is a hybrid.

 

Since its just a committee draft they have - minimum they should be doing is formally linking their dictionary to the CIQ element dictionary - so we know we have one to one correspondence.

 

Notice CAM now includes a handy dictionary creation feature - and dictionary compare tool - that creates a spreadsheet of the deltas.  I'd been meaning to socialize this fact with the other TC chairs... maybe now is a good moment to show this working here...

 

The SET TC is also looking at how to formalize intra-domain crosswalks.

 

Simply put - I don't mind them so much using goofy home spun address formats - so long as they can show equivalence - so there is zero transformation needed in and out of CIQ - just simple assignments.

 

This is not the first one I've encountered this week.  I noticed the US DoD is creating Address now with free format lines and then qualified elements - that looks very similar to CIQ, but subtly different.  I'll be commenting on the DoD one when they put that out for public comment too.

 

Thanks, DW

 

 

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [ciq] FW: [members] Public Review of eNotarization Markup
Language (ENML) Version 1.0

From: <Colin.Wallis@ssc.govt.nz>
Date: Tue, March 24, 2009 5:13 pm
To: <ciq@lists.oasis-open.org>, <kumar.sydney@gmail.com>
Cc: <egov-sc@lists.oasis-open.org>



Greetings all

We have a problem I believe because the customer information doesn't
look like CIQ...

Cheers
Colin



-----Original Message-----
From: Mary McRae [mailto:mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org]
Sent: Wednesday, 25 March 2009 6:37 a.m.
To: members@lists.oasis-open.org; tc-announce@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: legalxml-enotary@lists.oasis-open.org; tab@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [members] Public Review of eNotarization Markup Language (ENML)
Version 1.0

To OASIS Members, Public Announce Lists:

The OASIS LegalXML eNotarization TC has recently approved the following
specification as a Committee Draft and approved the package for public
review:

eNotarization Markup Language (ENML) Version 1.0

The public review starts today, 24 March 2009, and ends 23 May 2009.
This is an open invitation to comment. We strongly encourage feedback
from potential users, developers and others, whether OASIS members or
not, for the sake of improving the interoperability and quality of OASIS
work. Please feel free to distribute this announcement within your
organization and to other appropriate mail lists.

More non-normative information about the specification and the technical
committee may be found at the public home page of the TC at
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=legalxml-enot
ary
. Comments may be submitted to the TC by any person through the use of
the OASIS TC Comment Facility which can be located via the button marked
"Send A Comment" at the top of that page, or directly at:
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/comments/index.php?wg_abbrev=legalx
ml-enotary
.

Submitted comments (for this work as well as other works of that TC) are
publicly archived and can be viewed at:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/legalxml-enotary-comment/. All
comments submitted to OASIS are subject to the OASIS Feedback License,
which ensures that the feedback you provide carries the same obligations
at least as the obligations of the TC members.

The specification document and related files are available here:

Editable Source:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/legalxml-enotary/enml/v1.0/pr01/ENML-1.0-Spec
ification.odt

PDF:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/legalxml-enotary/enml/v1.0/pr01/ENML-1.0-Spec
ification.pdf

HTML:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/legalxml-enotary/enml/v1.0/pr01/ENML-1.0-Spec
ification.html

Schema:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/legalxml-enotary/enml/v1.0/pr01/enml-200901-p
r01.xsd


OASIS and the LegalXML eNotarization TC welcome your comments.


Mary P McRae
Director, Technical Committee Administration
OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
email: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org
web: www.oasis-open.org
twitter: fiberartisan
phone: 1.603.232.9090




---------------------------------------------------------------------

This email list is used solely by OASIS for official consortium
communications.

Opt-out requests may be sent to member-services@oasis-open.org, however,
all members are strongly encouraged to maintain a subscription to this
list.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php