RE: [ciq] FW: [members] Public Review of eNotarization Markup Language(ENML) Version 1.0

["David RR Webber \(XML\)" <david@drrw.info>]

Ram,

 

I'm loving it!  I'll provide feedback to DoD folks next week and we shall see what happens...

 

We should also consider putting this up on our OASIS wiki page as an example.

 

I think Rex is correct - this may just be more of an education and facilitation issue - showing people how to quickly do this - more than anything else.

 

Thanks, DW

p.s. There's so many huge ugly schemas out there from standards groups (naming no names!) - that people naturally assume this is going to be more trouble, rather than a simple exercise, eh?!?!

 

 

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [ciq] FW: [members] Public Review of eNotarization Markup
Language (ENML) Version 1.0
From: Ram Kumar <kumar.sydney@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, March 27, 2009 2:12 pm
To: "David RR Webber (XML)" <david@drrw.info>
Cc: Colin.Wallis@ssc.govt.nz, egov-sc@lists.oasis-open.org,
ciq@lists.oasis-open.org

David,

 

As a quick fix (took me 10 minutes), I took your address example schema and replaced the address details with xAL. I left the other stuff you had as they are specific to the DoD requirements. Whatever is in the address details of DoD can be represented using xAL. This shows how xAL can be reused and no other CIQ entities are required for this. Enclosed are the schemas.

 

All the address elements of DoD below can be easily mapped to xAL with mimimal effort:

DiscreteAddress

AptSuiteNumber

ApoFpoNumber

PostOfficeBoxNumber

StreetDirectionCode

StreetName

StreetNumber

StreetTypeCode

CityIdentifier

NeighborhoodIdentifier

PostalZoneIdentifier

UsCongressionalDistrictIdentifier

CountryPrimaryDivision

Country

Other

MailStop

AttentionLine

FreeFormAddress

AddressLine1

AddressLine2

AddressLine3

AddressLine4

 

 

Let me know what you think.

 

Regards,

 

Ram

 

On 3/28/09, David RR Webber (XML) <david@drrw.info> wrote:

Ram,

 

That would be a big help.  Look forward to seeing that.

 

Then we can refactor their schema and show how they can align to CIQ better and simpler...

 

Thanks, DW

 

 

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [ciq] FW: [members] Public Review of eNotarization Markup
Language (ENML) Version 1.0
From: Ram Kumar <kumar.sydney@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, March 27, 2009 1:49 am
To: "David RR Webber (XML)" <david@drrw.info>
Cc: Colin.Wallis@ssc.govt.nz, egov-sc@lists.oasis-open.org,
ciq@lists.oasis-open.org

No problems with this. I will do it and send you the updated sheet.

 

Ram

 

On 3/26/09, David RR Webber (XML) <david@drrw.info> wrote:

Colin,

 

Attached ZIP is the challenge.  Can we reconcile this to CIQ?  Looks like we should be able to add a column to the Excel spreadsheet enclosed and put in the matching CIQ elements...as a frist step.

 

Thanks, DW