[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [cmis] Looking for additional information around CMIS conformant authentication
Jens- You’re welcome to check
out my posts about accessing CMIS from WCF, which include source code: http://craigrandall.net/archives/2009/01/consuming-cmis-wsdl-in-visual-studio/. At the tail end of this post, I
state “implicit
SOAP headers in a contract require extra coding on the part of a consumer.” Anyway, download my sample and
read its README file and the code. It explains, I believe, the very condition
you’ve encountered. Regards, -Craig From: Jens Hübel
[mailto:jhuebel@opentext.com] Hi all, we are currently investigating how to add support
WS-Security 1.1 to our CMIS implementation. To test interoperability Java-.Net
we are trying to build a sample (Hello World like) client to authenticate
against server. It seems that in the WCF configuration in .Net you can set a
whole bunch of various options and parameters in the behaviors and bindings
sections. Currently we are facing the problem that the .Net client always
generates some information that the server does not understand (causing
exceptions etc.). Well this problem is just our implementation issue and
probably the spec in this regard is accurate and precise enough. However I
wonder if we could make life easier (having the PlugFest in mind) from a
practical perspective if: a)
someone has already tested this and could provide a
sample configuration file that works at least in one repository b)
we should agree to support at least one common
configuration (again not as part of the spec but just for practical reasons at
the plugfest) for .Net and Java c)
we have a common place to share such things that are
not directly spec related but are just tools, guidelines, best practices that
make life easier for all us I remember that multiple vendors ran into the authentication
issue the last time. I assume that MTOM would be another candidate for such
kind of additional information. So perhaps we can make some preparations to be
as good as possible prepared for the next tests. Comments if you see any value
in this would be welcome. Thanks Jens P.S. I am not 100% sure if this mailing list is the right
place to ask questions like this. If there is any better place for questions
not directly related to the work on the spec please let me know. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]