RE: [cmis] Nikunj's blog postings on AtomPub vs CMIS

[Ryan Mcveigh <ryan.mcveigh@oracle.com>]

Hi Julian,

I spoke with Nikunj yesterday and at Oracle we share this general concern.  I propose this be a framing consideration during our working-group meeting tomorrow.  I'll end up filing issues for the notes Nikunj has posted as appropriate, since ultimately these are issues important to Oracle.

-Ryan

-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@greenbytes.de] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 5:46 AM
To: CMIS TC List
Subject: [cmis] Nikunj's blog postings on AtomPub vs CMIS

Hi,

to those who haven't seen then yet, I'd recommend reading Nikunj's 
latest postings on AtomPub vs CMIS, such as

<http://o-micron.blogspot.com/2009/05/cmis-ii-cmissing-good-old-atompub.html>

where he says:

"In my earlier post on AtomPub vs. CMIS, I expressed concern that new 
constraints on Atom syntax introduced by CMIS go so far as to rule out 
using a standard AtomPub client with a CMIS AtomPub server. In theory, 
one could say that adding a new required element to Atom's schema is a 
non-starter. However, if there is a desire for CMIS servers to support 
standard AtomPub clients, then the current spec is quite far from that 
goal."

...which concerns me a lot.

Rephrasing the question a bit: have there been attempts to use a 
non-CMIS AtomPub client to post a CMIS server? What was the outcome?

Best regards, Julian


-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH, Hafenweg 16, D-48155 Münster, Germany
Amtsgericht Münster: HRB5782


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php