[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (CMIS-509) Do we needgetProperties?
[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/CMIS-509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15645#action_15645 ] Florian Mueller commented on CMIS-509: -------------------------------------- All discussions about getProperties (including CMIS-424) took place before we introduced getObject. So we now have a slightly different situation. I think we should either make it really simple (-> remove allowable actions) so that it matches getRenditions and getAllowableActions or remove it entirely. > Do we need getProperties? > ------------------------- > > Key: CMIS-509 > URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/CMIS-509 > Project: OASIS Content Management Interoperability Services (CMIS) TC > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Domain Model, Web Services Binding > Affects Versions: Draft 0.63 > Reporter: Florian Mueller > Assignee: Ethan Gur-esh > > getProperties is a subset of getObject. Their signatures don't differ much in the Web Services binding and getProperties is not exposed in the AtomPub binding. Is there a compelling reason to keep it? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]