[OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (CMIS-714) Proposal to addRetention & Legal Hold Policies for next version of spec

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/CMIS-714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=26520#action_26520 ] 

David Churchland  commented on CMIS-714:
----------------------------------------

And on another topic...

Do we need the property holdIds for any purpose other than having at least one property on the secondary type?  In Trim we don't store an identifier from any outside system on the Hold.  I am not sure I see the value.  If we must have a property is there any chance we could have maybe just a hold name (or ID), something that does not imply more meaning than necessary? 

> Proposal to add Retention & Legal Hold Policies for next version of spec
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CMIS-714
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/CMIS-714
>             Project: OASIS Content Management Interoperability Services (CMIS) TC
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Domain Model
>            Reporter: Martin Hermes
>
> A new Draft Version 0.2 of the proposal to add Retention & Legal Hold Policies has been uploaded. Main differences to the previous version:
> - A "Managed Retention Policy" has been added to support repository-determined retention periods (Thanks to Jens)
> - Previous Retention Policy with expiration date and optional destruction date has been split into two policies: Retention Policy and Destruction Policy
> Feedback appreciated

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira