[courtfiling-process] NEW BusinessProcessesMappedToCourtLink_draft.xls uploaded

["jmessing" <jmessing@law-on-line.com>]

I apologize for not being able to attend today's meeting, but it has not been possible to break away.

With regard to Shane's draft, I think it is a good start but I am concerned whether the steps under process (the left-hand most column) are sufficiently standardized, derived from common agreement, or are sufficiently intuitive to be applied by various vendors and courts who may not yet be in communication, or whether the needs of a particular system (here CourtLink) have required Shane to add steps that others may not need or understand (eg, 12 and 13).

-----Original Message-----
From: Shane.Durham@lexisnexis.com [mailto:Shane.Durham@lexisnexis.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 8:16 AM
To: courtfiling-process@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [courtfiling-process] NEW
BusinessProcessesMappedToCourtLink_draft.xls uploaded


After discussing the draft with Dwight and getting some additional feedback
from Tom, I determined that the work I had done was not quite what was
needed of me.

I have attached a new version of the CourtLink business process for your
review.  (I am sorry about the very very late hour.  I will, of course,
bring printed copies to today's meeting).

The new document has FAR less detail about CourtLink.. and focuses more on
the FORMAT of the document, which is what we had agreed to do at this point.

The new document drastically summarizes the filing process, purposely
excluding non-success scenarios, optional scenarios, and the like. 

It has just enough steps to demonstrate the proposed FORMAT of the document,
which is based upon the format previously established by Roger and
Catherine.  

- Shane Durham
LexisNexis CourtLink