[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cti-users] Re: [cti-stix] [cti-users] MTI Binding
I think that using these simple idioms would be great for folks to see roughly what the different forms look like but I do not think they would be sufficient for comparing size and complexity as a whole.
These are VERY simple example structures. More complex examples would likely differ from these simple ones in how each representation tackle size and complexity.
sean
From: <cti-users@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Terry MacDonald
Date: Friday, October 2, 2015 at 5:51 PM To: "Jordan, Bret" Cc: "cti-users@lists.oasis-open.org", "cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org", John Wunder Subject: Re: [cti-users] Re: [cti-stix] [cti-users] MTI Binding +1. Is a nice idea as we can see a size and complexity comparison. Is there any chance each person can document the process that the generation took? I'm thinking it could be useful to see how complicated the toolchain for developing each type of output is. Cheers On 3 Oct 2015 6:33 am, "Jordan, Bret" <bret.jordan@bluecoat.com> wrote:
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]